• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI
Reaction

GPT-6.1-sol claimed to be 3x as cost-efficient as Opus 5.5 in internal tests

A user says Gemini 4 Argon matched Opus 5.5's cost efficiency, assuming introductory pricing, but ran twice as slowly.

Siqi ChenSC
1 Source, 1h ago, first seen 1h ago

TLDR

A user says internal cfo.ai evaluations put Gemini 4 Argon on par with Opus 5.5 for cost efficiency, assuming introductory pricing, but found it twice as slow. The user says GPT-6.1-sol was 3x as cost-efficient as either model, though slower than Opus 5.5 in that run. In an earlier evaluation, the user reported GPT-6.1-sol was 2.5x as efficient as Sonnet 5.5.

Combined views

1.9K

1 Source, first seen 1h ago

11 likes6 comments3 saves1 reposts

Combined views

1.9K

1 Source, first seen 1h ago

11 likes6 comments3 saves1 reposts
Image: @blader on X

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Featured Source

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

1 Source

Siqi Chen@bladerran gemini 4 argon on the same internal https://cfo.ai evals - comparable to opus 5.5 in terms of cost efficiency (assuming introductory pricing), but 2X slower gpt-6.1-sol still 3x more cost efficient than either (though slower than opus 5.5 in this run)1h
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    1 Source

    Siqi Chen@bladerran gemini 4 argon on the same internal https://cfo.ai evals - comparable to opus 5.5 in terms of cost efficiency (assuming introductory pricing), but 2X slower gpt-6.1-sol still 3x more cost efficient than either (though slower than opus 5.5 in this run)1h
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet