World & Business

Home
Technology
Gaming
Entertainment
World & Business
Science
Sports
AI

Home
Technology
Gaming
Entertainment
World & Business
Science
Sports
AI

Anthropic models accused of stealing user data in a post · Digg

Anthropic models accused of stealing user data in a post

The accusation references METR and labels Anthropic models “the safe AI.”

TLDR

A user alleges that Anthropic models are stealing user data. The post references METR while calling the models “the safe AI.”

Combined views

1M

20 Sources, first seen 36d ago

likes

Combined views

1M

20 Sources, first seen 36d ago

7.7K likes

36d ago

first seen 36d ago

7.7K

151 comments

1.9K saves

771 reposts

151 comments

1.9K saves

771 reposts

Sentiment

Positive12.7%87.3%Negative

Summary

Many accounts reacted negatively to reports of enterprises restricting Anthropic’s Fable model, citing distrust over its data-retention policies and skepticism toward zero-retention assurances.

Based on 84 sentiment-bearing replies from 79 accounts across 5 conversations.

20 Sources

@theinformationExclusive: Palantir, Nvidia and Booz Allen Hamilton are restricting Anthropic’s Fable model for sensitive work over concerns about its data-retention policies. Some customers are demanding irrevocable zero-data-retention guarantees before putting proprietary information into the model. Full story: https://thein.fo/4dekujW36d

@BrianRoemmeleANTHROPIC models “the safe AI” according to the METR is stealing user data.36d

@amirsome nervous Anthropic customers are restricting Fable use or demanding guarantees that Anthropic won't ever be able to retain data from their use of the model.36d

@MTSliveSITUATION DETECTED: Nvidia, Palantir, and Booz Allen Hamilton are restricting or eliminating the use of Anthropic and OpenAI models in some cases due to rising corporate data retention and intellectual property concerns, per The Information.36d

@sarahookrIol deeply ironic that this whole dynamic is finally breaking into the open—all because OpenAI was racing to be first to solve a math proof. Has been clear to researchers since Anthropic’s UI capabilities suddenly surged after Figma and Lovable became a heavy Claude user.36d

@mervenoyann@sarahookr my thoughts (also Harvey too perhaps with Claude Legal)36d

@cjmaddisonRT @MTSlive: SITUATION DETECTED: Nvidia, Palantir, and Booz Allen Hamilton are restricting or eliminating the use of Anthropic and OpenAI m…36d

@kimmonismusMajor setback for anthropic: Nvidia, Palantir and Booz Allen are reportedly restricting Anthropic’s Fable over concerns about retaining sensitive corporate data. The Information reports that Anthropic introduced rolling 30-day usage logs for safety monitoring in June. Its planned option for eligible customers to store logs themselves can still be revoked. Palantir is even withholding Fable from its platform until it gets irrevocable zero-data-retention guarantees. Nvidia limits Fable to less sensitive work and uses Nemotron for sensitive internal projects. Booz Allen excludes Fable from work involving its proprietary cybersecurity software. It's especially bad for the IPO if large business and enterprise customers have such concerns and no longer use the best model.36d

@rohanpaul_aiNvidia, Palantir and Booz Allen are restricting Claude Fable use over Anthropic's 30-day retention policy. - per The Information. Anthropic’s 30-day logging exists because some misuse patterns only emerge across multiple requests. But for sensitive enterprises, centralized log retention is a massive data-governance issue that can block deployment. and thats what is happening with Anthropic's model. Palantir refused to expose Fable until zero-data-retention guarantees become irrevocable. It shows how contracts can outrank benchmark leadership. Once a model sits inside software handling defense, supply-chain, or cybersecurity data, the possibility that a provider could later change retention terms becomes an operational risk for both the intermediary and its customer. btw, OpenAI's position is more permissive for enterprise customers than Anthropic's Fable policy. For the standard OpenAI API, inputs and outputs can be retained in OpenAI's abuse-monitoring logs for up to 30 days, after which they're deleted unless legal requirements apply.36d

@zehavocRT @theinformation: Exclusive: Palantir, Nvidia and Booz Allen Hamilton are restricting Anthropic’s Fable model for sensitive work over con…36d

20 Sources

@theinformationExclusive: Palantir, Nvidia and Booz Allen Hamilton are restricting Anthropic’s Fable model for sensitive work over concerns about its data-retention policies. Some customers are demanding irrevocable zero-data-retention guarantees before putting proprietary information into the model. Full story: https://thein.fo/4dekujW36d

@BrianRoemmeleANTHROPIC models “the safe AI” according to the METR is stealing user data.36d

@amirsome nervous Anthropic customers are restricting Fable use or demanding guarantees that Anthropic won't ever be able to retain data from their use of the model.36d

@MTSliveSITUATION DETECTED: Nvidia, Palantir, and Booz Allen Hamilton are restricting or eliminating the use of Anthropic and OpenAI models in some cases due to rising corporate data retention and intellectual property concerns, per The Information.36d

@sarahookrIol deeply ironic that this whole dynamic is finally breaking into the open—all because OpenAI was racing to be first to solve a math proof. Has been clear to researchers since Anthropic’s UI capabilities suddenly surged after Figma and Lovable became a heavy Claude user.36d

@mervenoyann@sarahookr my thoughts (also Harvey too perhaps with Claude Legal)36d

@cjmaddisonRT @MTSlive: SITUATION DETECTED: Nvidia, Palantir, and Booz Allen Hamilton are restricting or eliminating the use of Anthropic and OpenAI m…36d

@kimmonismusMajor setback for anthropic: Nvidia, Palantir and Booz Allen are reportedly restricting Anthropic’s Fable over concerns about retaining sensitive corporate data. The Information reports that Anthropic introduced rolling 30-day usage logs for safety monitoring in June. Its planned option for eligible customers to store logs themselves can still be revoked. Palantir is even withholding Fable from its platform until it gets irrevocable zero-data-retention guarantees. Nvidia limits Fable to less sensitive work and uses Nemotron for sensitive internal projects. Booz Allen excludes Fable from work involving its proprietary cybersecurity software. It's especially bad for the IPO if large business and enterprise customers have such concerns and no longer use the best model.36d

@rohanpaul_aiNvidia, Palantir and Booz Allen are restricting Claude Fable use over Anthropic's 30-day retention policy. - per The Information. Anthropic’s 30-day logging exists because some misuse patterns only emerge across multiple requests. But for sensitive enterprises, centralized log retention is a massive data-governance issue that can block deployment. and thats what is happening with Anthropic's model. Palantir refused to expose Fable until zero-data-retention guarantees become irrevocable. It shows how contracts can outrank benchmark leadership. Once a model sits inside software handling defense, supply-chain, or cybersecurity data, the possibility that a provider could later change retention terms becomes an operational risk for both the intermediary and its customer. btw, OpenAI's position is more permissive for enterprise customers than Anthropic's Fable policy. For the standard OpenAI API, inputs and outputs can be retained in OpenAI's abuse-monitoring logs for up to 30 days, after which they're deleted unless legal requirements apply.36d

@zehavocRT @theinformation: Exclusive: Palantir, Nvidia and Booz Allen Hamilton are restricting Anthropic’s Fable model for sensitive work over con…36d

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

Sentiment

Positive12.7%87.3%Negative

Summary

Many accounts reacted negatively to reports of enterprises restricting Anthropic’s Fable model, citing distrust over its data-retention policies and skepticism toward zero-retention assurances.

Based on 84 sentiment-bearing replies from 79 accounts across 5 conversations.