• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI
Reaction

Training an autoregressive model to mimic Monte Carlo tree search

A reply calls training on node traces “super inefficient” and asks why not call a tool instead.

Yann LeCunYL
François FleuretFF
2 Sources, 1h ago, first seen 1h ago

TLDR

One commenter asks if an autoregressive model could mimic Monte Carlo tree search by training on traces of its nodes. A reply says yes, but calls the approach “super inefficient,” comparing it to teaching a language model arithmetic when it could call a tool. The first commenter thinks chain-of-thought does something similar and agrees the efficiency is “horrible.”

Combined views

775

2 Sources, first seen 1h ago

1 likes2 comments

Combined views

775

2 Sources, first seen 1h ago

1 likes2 comments

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Featured Source

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

2 Sources

Yann LeCun@ylecun@francoisfleuret Yes, but that's a super inefficient way of doing it. Kind a like teaching an LLM to do arithmetics. What's the point when you can call a tool ?1h
François Fleuret@francoisfleuret@ylecun I really think it's what cot do, and I totally agree efficiency is horrible.1h
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    2 Sources

    Yann LeCun@ylecun@francoisfleuret Yes, but that's a super inefficient way of doing it. Kind a like teaching an LLM to do arithmetics. What's the point when you can call a tool ?1h
    François Fleuret@francoisfleuret@ylecun I really think it's what cot do, and I totally agree efficiency is horrible.1h
    Today's Rank

    #11

    Today's Rank

    #11