• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI

Premium AI versus intelligence “too cheap to meter”

A user predicted on September 20 that AI price cuts were unlikely anytime soon, arguing that the market favors “premium intelligence.”

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)T(
7 Sources, 20d ago, first seen 20d ago

TLDR

In a September 20 comment, a user argued that “the market has spoken,” favoring premium intelligence over intelligence “too cheap to meter.” Their expectation: no AI price cuts anytime soon.

Combined views

24.7K

7 Sources, first seen 20d ago

423 likes28 comments51 saves10 reposts

Combined views

24.7K

7 Sources, first seen 20d ago

423 likes28 comments51 saves10 reposts

Sentiment

Positive53.3%46.7%Negative

Summary

Replies welcomed DeepSeek's fast, premium intelligence at low prices and cool agent swarms, while others doubted swarm efficiency and said users still overpay for familiar brands.

Based on 20 sentiment-bearing replies from 20 accounts across 3 conversations.

Sentiment

Positive53.3%46.7%Negative

Summary

Replies welcomed DeepSeek's fast, premium intelligence at low prices and cool agent swarms, while others doubted swarm efficiency and said users still overpay for familiar brands.

Based on 20 sentiment-bearing replies from 20 accounts across 3 conversations.

7 Sources

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTexI'm afraid we're not having price cuts any time soon the market has spoken. Premium intelligence > intelligence too cheap to meter20d
Minh Nhat Nguyen 🦭@menhguin@teortaxesTex i have a further theory that in 2027, the labs will start generating revenue from automated research, which is the only usecase lucrative enough for Fable+ tier model use at scale20d
Anthony Pompliano 🌪@APomplianoThe price war for AI tokens is underway.18d
edwin@edwinarbus$1.34 on default settings (medium, which is Fable 5.1-level intelligence) low gets to $0.55 (which is around Fable 5.1 on low)17d
Ian Hogarth@soundboyI keep hearing people say that "frontier models will end up with 10-20% of the token volume but capture 80-90% of the economic value". Why would that be the case? What are the best arguments as to why you'd get that kind of pareto distribution?16d
Peter J. Liu@peterjliu@Yuchenj_UW no reason to cap token spend if it's useful. $5k/day can make sense.15d
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    7 Sources

    Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTexI'm afraid we're not having price cuts any time soon the market has spoken. Premium intelligence > intelligence too cheap to meter20d
    Minh Nhat Nguyen 🦭@menhguin@teortaxesTex i have a further theory that in 2027, the labs will start generating revenue from automated research, which is the only usecase lucrative enough for Fable+ tier model use at scale20d
    Anthony Pompliano 🌪@APomplianoThe price war for AI tokens is underway.18d
    edwin@edwinarbus$1.34 on default settings (medium, which is Fable 5.1-level intelligence) low gets to $0.55 (which is around Fable 5.1 on low)17d
    Ian Hogarth@soundboyI keep hearing people say that "frontier models will end up with 10-20% of the token volume but capture 80-90% of the economic value". Why would that be the case? What are the best arguments as to why you'd get that kind of pareto distribution?16d
    Peter J. Liu@peterjliu@Yuchenj_UW no reason to cap token spend if it's useful. $5k/day can make sense.15d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet