• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Commentator Prefers Internal States Over Machine Wants Language

    Retweet shares advice on avoiding anthropomorphism when discussing AI motivations.

    NS
    1 Source, 31d ago, first seen 31d ago

    TLDR

    Gleech posted that people should not say the machine wants anything. The alternative phrasing offered is that there exist internal states s1 and s2 such that s1 leads to certain outcomes. Nabeel Qureshi retweeted the comment. The suggestion aims at more precise descriptions of how AI systems operate internally rather than attributing desires to them. Visible replies on the platform have not yet added new details to the exchange. The discussion centers on language choices for technical accuracy in AI conversations. The quote cuts off mid-sentence but conveys the core recommendation clearly in the shared text.

    Combined views

    60

    1 Source, first seen 31d ago

    Combined views

    60

    1 Source, first seen 31d ago

    4 reposts
    4 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 Source

    @nabeelquRT @gleech: 'You can't say the machine "wants" anything! Instead of "wants", I always say "there exist internal states s₁, s₂ such that s₁…

    1 Source

    @nabeelquRT @gleech: 'You can't say the machine "wants" anything! Instead of "wants", I always say "there exist internal states s₁, s₂ such that s₁…