• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Major math proofs should include AI chat transcripts, one post argues

    The author argues that proper attribution is “essentially impossible” without including chats with large language models as supplementary material.

    DP
    1 Source, 23d ago, first seen 23d ago

    TLDR

    One post urges the math community to establish a norm requiring any major proof to include transcripts of chats with large language models as supplementary material. The author frames this as an urgent step toward proper attribution, arguing that it is “essentially impossible otherwise.”

    Combined views

    13.8K

    1 Source, first seen 23d ago

    Combined views

    13.8K

    1 Source, first seen 23d ago

    556 likes
    556 likes
    13 comments
    43 saves
    48 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    13 comments
    43 saves
    48 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @pfauI think it's vitally important that the math community immediately establishes the norm that any major proof includes transcripts from LLM chats as supplementary material. Proper attribution is essentially impossible otherwise.

    1 Source

    @pfauI think it's vitally important that the math community immediately establishes the norm that any major proof includes transcripts from LLM chats as supplementary material. Proper attribution is essentially impossible otherwise.