China considers restricting foreign access to domestic frontier AI models from Alibaba and ByteDance
The proposed rules mirror US export controls on critical technology.
The proposed rules mirror US export controls on critical technology.
Related Stories
5 linkedView all
- 数字法治|【圆桌论坛】人工智能时代开源治理的法律回应(下)‖ 杜微科、张平、孙海龙、陈兵、王鑫、辜凌云 - 最高人民法院知识产权法庭court.gov.cn · “十五五”规划纲要强调,“深入推进数字中国建设,提升数智化发展水平。”当前,以人工智能为代表的数智技术加速演进、生产方式发生深层次变革,开源已从社群内部的技术协作机制,逐步成长为关涉创新生态、产业发展与社会治理的重要议题。开源在实践中的演进速度持续加快,亟需加强制度供给。 人工智能时代的开源,治理对象从单一代码扩展为模型、数据、权重、工具链的复合体,治理场景从本土协作延伸至全球合作与竞争。在这样一个生态日趋丰富、场景更加多元、科技快速进化的前沿领域,知识产权法律制度应当如何适应与回应? 2026年1月,最高人民法院将“开源技术知识产权法律问题研究”列入年度司法研究重大课题。我们邀请相关课题组专家与技术专家,从知识产权法、竞争法、数据法、司法实践与人工智能技术等不同视角,围绕开源治理中的知识产权核心议题展开讨论。讨论中既有对基本概念的理论澄清,也有对制度滞后的敏锐洞察,更有对中国方案的建构思考。希望这些讨论能够为开源治理的制度完善提供学理支撑,为数字时代的法治建设贡献一份智识力量。 【圆桌论坛】 杜微科:开源在促进开放合作的同时,也可能伴随平台控制、技术路径依赖、生态锁定,以及由此引发的市场支配地位与排除、限
- Pleiaspleias.ai · The most powerful models Europe lost access to this year happen to be called the Fable series. It is the kind of coincidence you cannot improve on, because the suspension did not create a European vulnerability so much as expose a fable Europe had been telling itself for the better part of the post-chatGPT boom: that it did not need to build the substrate of artificial intelligence, only to use it well. Own the application layer, the story went, and let others burn the capital underneath. When the layer underneath was switched off from Washington, the story switched off with it.



