• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Current limits of AI peer review in judging novelty

    A user sharing work by Zhang and colleagues says it argues that judging novelty remains beyond even otherwise capable AI models.

    SL
    1 Source, 16d ago, first seen 16d ago

    TLDR

    The paper’s arXiv summary says large language models are increasingly used in peer review at major AI conferences, but novelty remains a persistent weak point. A user sharing the work by Zhang and colleagues welcomes it as a concrete examination of AI peer review, describing its argument as a limitation of current models: they cannot yet judge novelty.

    Combined views

    1.9K

    1 Source, first seen 16d ago

    Combined views

    1.9K

    1 Source, first seen 16d ago

    24 likes
    24 likes
    1 comments
    11 saves
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 comments
    11 saves
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @sethlazarGlad to see people actually putting flesh on the bones of the “just use ai for peer review” proposal. This (by Zhang et al) argues that judgements of novelty are beyond otherwise very capable models, as yet… https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11234

    1 Source

    @sethlazarGlad to see people actually putting flesh on the bones of the “just use ai for peer review” proposal. This (by Zhang et al) argues that judgements of novelty are beyond otherwise very capable models, as yet… https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11234