• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Cash reportedly goes unspent in AI-run town simulation

    A post summarizing the study says a 12-fold tourist shock raised business revenue 4.62-fold, while wages moved 1.03-fold and only 0.3% of 3,981 menu items were ever repriced.

    EL
    2 Sources, 19d ago, first seen 19d ago

    TLDR

    A post describes a paper that put 100 large language model agents in charge of a town economy for 26 simulated weeks, using Pokhara Lakeside geography across 91 runs and 2.44 million decisions. According to the summary, 96.7% of a cash transfer remained unspent 311 steps later. Changing the underlying model changed every measured outcome, while deleting the agents’ memory changed none detectably. The summary also highlights why simulation length mattered: wealth rankings looked frozen at two weeks and only started moving by week 12.

    Combined views

    11.9K

    2 Sources, first seen 19d ago

    Combined views

    11.9K

    2 Sources, first seen 19d ago

    97 likes
    97 likes
    20 comments
    102 saves
    28 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    20 comments
    102 saves
    28 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    2 Sources

    @omarsar0What happens if you agents to run a town's economy? This super interesting paper provides some insights: They put 100 LLM agents in charge of a town economy for 26 simulated weeks, and they find that money stops moving. The agents earn wages, run businesses and set prices on real Pokhara Lakeside geography, across 91 runs and 2.44M decisions. A 12x tourist shock raises business revenue 4.62x. Wages move 1.03x, and only 0.3% of 3,981 menu items are ever repriced. A cash transfer shows the same pattern. 96.7% of it is still unspent 311 steps later. Here is the interesting part for anyone building agent simulations. Swapping the underlying LLM changed every outcome they measured. Deleting the agents' memory changed none of them detectably. Results at the usual 1 to 2 week horizon also mislead. Wealth rankings look frozen at 2 weeks and only start to move by week 12. Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11108 Chat with Paper: https://academy.dair.ai/papers/but-how-would-ai-agents-run-a-towns-economy-2609.11108

    2 Sources

    @omarsar0What happens if you agents to run a town's economy? This super interesting paper provides some insights: They put 100 LLM agents in charge of a town economy for 26 simulated weeks, and they find that money stops moving. The agents earn wages, run businesses and set prices on real Pokhara Lakeside geography, across 91 runs and 2.44M decisions. A 12x tourist shock raises business revenue 4.62x. Wages move 1.03x, and only 0.3% of 3,981 menu items are ever repriced. A cash transfer shows the same pattern. 96.7% of it is still unspent 311 steps later. Here is the interesting part for anyone building agent simulations. Swapping the underlying LLM changed every outcome they measured. Deleting the agents' memory changed none of them detectably. Results at the usual 1 to 2 week horizon also mislead. Wealth rankings look frozen at 2 weeks and only start to move by week 12. Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11108 Chat with Paper: https://academy.dair.ai/papers/but-how-would-ai-agents-run-a-towns-economy-2609.11108