—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet
@benjitaylorI no longer see any compelling reason to believe that taste is some permanent boundary LLMs won’t cross. It’s already happening.
@julianlehrCounter argument: Not only is taste subjective, it's a moving target. As soon as [tasteful thing] becomes easily replicable, it stops being tasteful. Taste is a status game with a strong defensibility mechanism. That's why the term is so fuzzy and ill-defined. Vagueness is the whole point. It's meant to be hard to copy.
@elonmuskRT @benjitaylor: I no longer see any compelling reason to believe that taste is some permanent boundary LLMs won’t cross. It’s already happ…@benjitaylorI no longer see any compelling reason to believe that taste is some permanent boundary LLMs won’t cross. It’s already happening.@julianlehrCounter argument: Not only is taste subjective, it's a moving target. As soon as [tasteful thing] becomes easily replicable, it stops being tasteful. Taste is a status game with a strong defensibility mechanism. That's why the term is so fuzzy and ill-defined. Vagueness is the whole point. It's meant to be hard to copy.@elonmuskRT @benjitaylor: I no longer see any compelling reason to believe that taste is some permanent boundary LLMs won’t cross. It’s already happ…@benjitaylorI no longer see any compelling reason to believe that taste is some permanent boundary LLMs won’t cross. It’s already happening.@julianlehrCounter argument: Not only is taste subjective, it's a moving target. As soon as [tasteful thing] becomes easily replicable, it stops being tasteful. Taste is a status game with a strong defensibility mechanism. That's why the term is so fuzzy and ill-defined. Vagueness is the whole point. It's meant to be hard to copy.@elonmuskRT @benjitaylor: I no longer see any compelling reason to believe that taste is some permanent boundary LLMs won’t cross. It’s already happ…@benjitaylorI no longer see any compelling reason to believe that taste is some permanent boundary LLMs won’t cross. It’s already happening.@julianlehrCounter argument: Not only is taste subjective, it's a moving target. As soon as [tasteful thing] becomes easily replicable, it stops being tasteful. Taste is a status game with a strong defensibility mechanism. That's why the term is so fuzzy and ill-defined. Vagueness is the whole point. It's meant to be hard to copy.@elonmuskRT @benjitaylor: I no longer see any compelling reason to believe that taste is some permanent boundary LLMs won’t cross. It’s already happ…
