Many users endorsed Paul Graham's advice for founders to study users or pursue small precise ideas after reporting their own positive results, whereas some dismissed the suggestions as irrelevant or overly solipsistic.
Based on 29 visible X reactions from 198 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@paulg i built @Lebenmaster exactly using this technique, to good results
@paulg you are no longer relevant, nor is your unsolicited advice
@paulg Small? Doesn’t sound like a good investment. Hard pass
@paulg Absolutely right
The biggest mistake young founders make is a variant of this: to build something you imagine people want, instead of studying them and figuring out what they actually do want. But the hack for beating this is to roll with your solipsism and make something for yourself. https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/2076726980267909148
@paulg i built @Lebenmaster exactly using this technique, to good results
The biggest mistake young founders make is a variant of this: to build something you imagine people want, instead of studying them and figuring out what they actually do want. But the hack for beating this is to roll with your solipsism and make something for yourself. https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/2076726980267909148
An initial startup idea can't usually be both grand and precise. In practice they're usually either grand and vague or precise and small. Precise and small is better. You know who your initial users are, and you expand outward. With grand and vague you can't even get started.
This is yet another reason it's good for young founders, especially, to start by building something they themselves want. If you're the intended user, you're not going to be satisfied with vague. (Nor is any user, but at least this way you're forced to see it.)
live in the future and make something you desperately need https://twitter.com/paulg/status/2076729604359016751
Many users endorsed Paul Graham's advice for founders to study users or pursue small precise ideas after reporting their own positive results, whereas some dismissed the suggestions as irrelevant or overly solipsistic.
Based on 29 visible X reactions from 198 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
An initial startup idea can't usually be both grand and precise. In practice they're usually either grand and vague or precise and small. Precise and small is better. You know who your initial users are, and you expand outward. With grand and vague you can't even get started.
This is yet another reason it's good for young founders, especially, to start by building something they themselves want. If you're the intended user, you're not going to be satisfied with vague. (Nor is any user, but at least this way you're forced to see it.)