The argument that many would prefer extinction risk to an AI-fueled world government
The post imagines a single AI-fueled global government combining what its author considers the worst regulatory and social policies of the past 20 years.
TLDR
One post argues that many people would find a 10% chance of ending humanity far preferable to a roughly 100% chance of living under an AI-fueled global government combining what the author calls the worst regulatory and social policies of the past 20 years. The author criticizes others on their timeline for being unable to entertain that preference.
Combined views
1.5M
63 Sources, first seen ago
