• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Acemoglu Questions AI Revolution in Many Areas

    MIT economist and Nobel laureate posted views on X about AI limits.

    DA
    1 Source, 30d ago, first seen 30d ago

    TLDR

    Daron Acemoglu, Institute Professor at MIT and Nobel laureate in economics, posted on X that in many areas where technooptimists expect AI to revolutionize everything, the impact may be much less positive. He wrote that current approaches do not help reach the bottom of mechanisms of human cognition, discovery, and innovation. Acemoglu added that many of those areas need more and higher quality data. The visible portion of the post ends mid-sentence.

    Combined views

    68.4K

    1 Source, first seen 30d ago

    Combined views

    68.4K

    1 Source, first seen 30d ago

    872 likes
    872 likes
    41 comments
    178 saves
    165 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    41 comments
    178 saves
    165 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @DAcemogluMITIn fact, in many areas where technooptimists argue that AI is going to revolutionize everything, the impact may be much less positive because current approaches are not helping us get to the bottom of mechanisms of human cognition, discovery, and innovation. In many of them, we need more and higher quality data to make further advance, and what makes AI very competent in coding and writing doesn’t generalize. Worse, in a few of them, AI enthusiasm may push research and investment in the wrong direction.

    1 Source

    @DAcemogluMITIn fact, in many areas where technooptimists argue that AI is going to revolutionize everything, the impact may be much less positive because current approaches are not helping us get to the bottom of mechanisms of human cognition, discovery, and innovation. In many of them, we need more and higher quality data to make further advance, and what makes AI very competent in coding and writing doesn’t generalize. Worse, in a few of them, AI enthusiasm may push research and investment in the wrong direction.