Pangram’s “100% AI” labels and the case for finer-grained scores
A user praises Pangram’s detection abilities but argues its stark labels encourage harsh judgments and don’t show how much human work went into a text.
TLDR
In one user’s experience, Pangram almost always labels each text segment “100% AI” or “100% human.” They praise its ability to distinguish AI-generated or edited text from human writing, but argue that poor calibration and a misleading interface fuel unnecessary polarization. The user says the labels don’t reveal how much human effort went into the content and wants finer-grained scores. Until then, they suggest avoiding AI for writing altogether.
Combined views
—
1 Source, first seen ago
