• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Human Level AI Defined as Top 0.1 Percent Performance

    A user argues the threshold should exceed human medians in AI discussions.

    DL
    1 Source, 26d ago, first seen 26d ago

    TLDR

    Dan Luu retweeted a post in which the original author described their internal benchmark for human level AI. The author wrote that the standard amounts to the top 0.1 percent of humans rather than the median. They stated this choice aligns better with their view of meaningful capability. The retweet circulates the comment among visible replies on the platform. The available source lines contain only the retweet and the quoted statement with no additional context or follow up posts shown.

    Combined views

    50

    1 Source, first seen 26d ago

    Combined views

    50

    1 Source, first seen 26d ago

    1 reposts
    1 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @danluuRT @kipperrii: in my head my bar for "human level" is actually "top 0.1% of humans" and i think this is more correct than human medians, in…

    1 Source

    @danluuRT @kipperrii: in my head my bar for "human level" is actually "top 0.1% of humans" and i think this is more correct than human medians, in…