• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    GPU compute markets: vertical integration or derivatives?

    A recent SF Compute hire says there isn't enough public data to price GPU indices and compute futures reliably, and argues that big private deals have drawn neoclouds away from adding market liquidity.

    evan conradEC
    1 Source, 20d ago, first seen 20d ago

    TLDR

    A user who says they recently moved from Lambda to SF Compute argues that there isn't enough public data to reliably price GPU indices and compute futures. They say many neoclouds have favored large private deals and clusters that boost valuations over adding liquidity to the market and their public-cloud businesses. They ask whether vertical integration, as with a neocloud, or a conventional derivatives market offers a better approach to the physical compute market.

    Combined views

    20

    1 Source, first seen 20d ago

    Combined views

    20

    1 Source, first seen 20d ago

    1 reposts
    1 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    evan conrad@evanjconradRT @Gen_Page: @edsgoode I agree there is not enough public data to reliably price GPU indices and compute futures. I recently joined SF C…20d

    1 Source

    evan conrad@evanjconradRT @Gen_Page: @edsgoode I agree there is not enough public data to reliably price GPU indices and compute futures. I recently joined SF C…20d