A user says people with high p(doom) can imagine AI with whatever capabilities would make their fears come true.
A user says it is hard to debate what AI's future will look like because people with high p(doom) can imagine an AI with whatever “magical capabilities” would make their fears come true.
3.1K
3 Sources, first seen ago
@sharongoldmanIn my latest Ground Level AI podcast, @RichardSocher puts his probability of AI wiping out humanity at zero, arguing that extinction scenarios give AI “near magical abilities” to attack—but underestimate our ability to defend. In the full episode (link in comments), we also discuss his conversations—and disagreements—with Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio about AI extinction risk.
@chrisalbonThis is basically my opinion. I find it hard to debate with people around what the future will look like because people with high p(doom) can basically invent an AI with whatever magical capabilities would make their fear true.
@RichardSocherRT @sharongoldman: In my latest Ground Level AI podcast, @RichardSocher puts his probability of AI wiping out humanity at zero, arguing th…@sharongoldmanIn my latest Ground Level AI podcast, @RichardSocher puts his probability of AI wiping out humanity at zero, arguing that extinction scenarios give AI “near magical abilities” to attack—but underestimate our ability to defend. In the full episode (link in comments), we also discuss his conversations—and disagreements—with Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio about AI extinction risk.@chrisalbonThis is basically my opinion. I find it hard to debate with people around what the future will look like because people with high p(doom) can basically invent an AI with whatever magical capabilities would make their fear true.@RichardSocherRT @sharongoldman: In my latest Ground Level AI podcast, @RichardSocher puts his probability of AI wiping out humanity at zero, arguing th…@sharongoldmanIn my latest Ground Level AI podcast, @RichardSocher puts his probability of AI wiping out humanity at zero, arguing that extinction scenarios give AI “near magical abilities” to attack—but underestimate our ability to defend. In the full episode (link in comments), we also discuss his conversations—and disagreements—with Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio about AI extinction risk.@chrisalbonThis is basically my opinion. I find it hard to debate with people around what the future will look like because people with high p(doom) can basically invent an AI with whatever magical capabilities would make their fear true.@RichardSocherRT @sharongoldman: In my latest Ground Level AI podcast, @RichardSocher puts his probability of AI wiping out humanity at zero, arguing th…@sharongoldmanIn my latest Ground Level AI podcast, @RichardSocher puts his probability of AI wiping out humanity at zero, arguing that extinction scenarios give AI “near magical abilities” to attack—but underestimate our ability to defend. In the full episode (link in comments), we also discuss his conversations—and disagreements—with Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio about AI extinction risk.@chrisalbonThis is basically my opinion. I find it hard to debate with people around what the future will look like because people with high p(doom) can basically invent an AI with whatever magical capabilities would make their fear true.@RichardSocherRT @sharongoldman: In my latest Ground Level AI podcast, @RichardSocher puts his probability of AI wiping out humanity at zero, arguing th…—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet
