/Tech3h ago

World Labs co-founder Fei-Fei Li argues that solving critical global challenges requires giving researchers access to advanced AI tools

She highlighted applications in medicine, physics, and materials science.

891.2K19412849.9K
Original post
Fei-Fei Li@drfeifei#14inTech

Scientific research is fundamental to advancing civilization and helping people globally to solve the most critical problems, from medicine to materials, from brain science to physics, and much beyond. This is only possible when scientists have access to the best tools of the time to conduct scientific research, including having access to AI-based tools.

8:46 AM · Jun 10, 2026 · 49K Views
Sentiment

Many users strongly back open access to AI tools for advancing global scientific research, while others criticize Anthropic's guardrails as cynical hype that harms scientists and reputation.

Pos
62.7%
Neg
37.3%
36 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS1.7KBOOKMARKS2LIKES8RETWEETS2REPLIES2
elvis@omarsar0

💯 Accelerating scientific research and access to the best tools are what got us here.

Not sure why some think that they can change our minds about that. They have no evidence of it and expect us to believe in that through pure brute force.

Open science and AI must win!

Fei-Fei Li@drfeifei

Scientific research is fundamental to advancing civilization and helping people globally to solve the most critical problems, from medicine to materials, from brain science to physics, and much beyond. This is only possible when scientists have access to the best tools of the time to conduct scientific research, including having access to AI-based tools.

1hViews 1.7KLikes 8Bookmarks 2

@drfeifei @drfeifei subtly throwing shade at @AnthropicAI was not on my bingo card for today

3hViews 332Likes 6
Yash@yash1_

@drfeifei For sure, research can be done with lower models too but to get the results fast, and to do great research we need frontier models which we already have in our timeline and they should not be gatekept in the name of security measure.

2hViews 657Likes 5
Jason@0xJasonw

@drfeifei We still need some constraints to technology, that’s humanity, rights, law. Uncontrolled technology advancing could cause disaster.

2hViews 228
JD | RoyalCities@RoyalCities

@drfeifei Imagine if modern cryptography had been built on restricted access.

"Trust us, it's secure. A select group of approved researchers can inspect it...but broad public scrutiny would be too dangerous."

Would that have made the internet safer?

2hViews 158Likes 1

Tool access is half of it. We can already map which immune agents to combine and in what order, since something like STAT3 behaves differently once IL-6 and TGF-beta rise. What we can't do is use them together. The system approves one drug at a time while the biology needs many. The best tools have to come with the freedom to use them at once.

1hViews 251Likes 2
Diam@diamai_

@drfeifei This feels obvious. If scientists are trying to cure diseases and solve real problems, give them the best tools we have. Don’t make them beg for the good version.

2hViews 575Likes 1
Clinical AI@AIForDoctors

@drfeifei Well said.

Just as microscopes revolutionized biology and computers transformed data analysis, AI is poised to become a foundational tool for modern scientific discovery.

The key is ensuring equitable and responsible access so innovation benefits everyone.

2hViews 563Likes 1
Duchateau Gaetan@GaetanDuchateau

@drfeifei It is also important to have access to a network and resources. Which is difficult when you have no academic affiliation.

2hViews 297Likes 1
Ani Emmanuel@TheAI_Ace

@drfeifei The exciting part isn't AI replacing scientists. It's AI helping scientists spend less time searching for answers and more time discovering them.

2hViews 356
Ed Sealing@EdSealing

@drfeifei Someone should start a Public Benefit Corp that helps in this area.

3hViews 95Likes 1
Richard@zzl_richard

@drfeifei 100 percent agreed, and look what Anthropic did.

3hViews 94Likes 1

@drfeifei We can understand where this tweet really directed

I completely support you on this cause

3hViews 74Likes 1
Dan McAteer@daniel_mac8

@drfeifei Thank you for saying so.

1hViews 62Likes 1
GOODIES@GNmachi80852

@drfeifei Li is a leading voice in AI (known for ImageNet and contributions to computer vision/spatial intelligence). The post advocates for equipping scientists with cutting-edge AI tools to accelerate discovery.

3hViews 180
Leon Zhu@LeonZhu139948

@drfeifei How dare you? How can you comment our Lord Dario and his great AI Safetism? My lord will send his inquisition forces to make sure you are safetism compliant.

1hViews 122

@drfeifei "Scientists"? What if a mathematician or philosopher or financial analyst wants to do some variant of scientific research? What if it even ends up with useful results somehow? How might they go about getting permission to do so and pivot to being an official and real Scientist?

2hViews 122
Alcreon@alcreon

@drfeifei AI often appears abstract or inaccessible, but by recognizing the role it already plays in our everyday lives, these systems and ideas become more evident and relevant.

2hViews 107
Load more posts