See the other thread for various caveats - I'm not saying it's net good. I am abstaining from a net opinion for now because there are many factors. But it could hardly be more different from preemption for nothing, or from yapping about datacenters)
("most substantive proposal put forward" among federal bill drafts, I mean. People have all sorts of ideas elsewhere)
Reminds me of a comment once about OpenAI writing better safety papers than Anthropic because there are more people skeptical of safety at OAI, the papers get better criticism, and the output is more robust.
Negotiation led to something better (in many ways) than Dems have done.
See the other thread for various caveats - I'm not saying it's net good. I am abstaining from a net opinion for now because there are many factors. But it could hardly be more different from preemption for nothing, or from yapping about datacenters)
See the other thread for various caveats - I'm not saying it's net good. I am abstaining from a net opinion for now because there are many factors. But it could hardly be more different from preemption for nothing, or from yapping about datacenters)
("most substantive proposal put forward" among federal bill drafts, I mean. People have all sorts of ideas elsewhere)
Users praise the federal AI bill draft as the most substantive proposal because negotiations produced improvements over prior efforts.
Reminds me of a comment once about OpenAI writing better safety papers than Anthropic because there are more people skeptical of safety at OAI, the papers get better criticism, and the output is more robust.
Negotiation led to something better (in many ways) than Dems have done.
See the other thread for various caveats - I'm not saying it's net good. I am abstaining from a net opinion for now because there are many factors. But it could hardly be more different from preemption for nothing, or from yapping about datacenters)