yeah dude in-context learning is all you need don't worry. btw you gotta check out the new model it's better because they trained it a lot more on a bunch of stuff
Will Brown, Prime Intellect research lead, argues in-context learning is insufficient compared to extensive model pretraining
Story Overview
Prime Intellect research lead Will Brown frames in-context learning as falling short for cutting-edge performance and points instead to models that receive far more extensive pretraining across diverse data, sharpening the long-running tension between clever prompting and raw compute scale.
Training scale still sets the ceiling
Brown contrasts quick context tricks with the gains from training on much larger, varied datasets, leaving open whether any prompting method can close that gap without matching the underlying compute investment.
Prime Intellect infrastructure ties into the claim
The company offers pretraining-as-a-service and RL tooling across thousands of environments, yet no specific new model, benchmarks, or availability details are tied to the July post.
Users in the replies sarcastically mocked claims that scaling to more parameters will overcome limitations in continual learning, though a few were optimistic about pairing in-context learning with enormous context windows.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Most Activity
@willccbb what’s the best way to reason about the limitations of in context learning?
yeah dude in-context learning is all you need don't worry. btw you gotta check out the new model it's better because they trained it a lot more on a bunch of stuff
@jeffreyhuber work with a coding agent across multiple compactions and get annoyed when you have to remind it stuff
@willccbb what’s the best way to reason about the limitations of in context learning?
@willccbb sure but that just could be bad compaction / memory
assume perfect context - what’s the limit?
@jeffreyhuber work with a coding agent across multiple compactions and get annoyed when you have to remind it stuff

@willccbb but will what if all that new stuff makes it better at in context learning

@benglickenhaus slightly

@jeffreyhuber compressing many many trajectories into O(100K) tokens is always gonna be lossy, tokens are a very expensive form of memory in that a small number of bits gets expanded into a large memory size (KV) via a static transformation. vs model weights themselves have params ~= bits

@willccbb i get all that!
i have a hard time reasoning about the task- specific ceiling.

@willccbb what i think would be very powerful is in-context learning paired with a 10 bil context window

@willccbb Wow. I didn't know there's no silver bullet but engineering tradeoffs. You're telling me now for the first time

@willccbb i feel like we got so excited about ICL but it wasn’t really a strong effect and then we just kind of swept it under the rug and made more environments and bought some more books

@willccbb @benglickenhaus i think the needle is moving somewhat

@willccbb More stuff -> better stuff 😌

@willccbb just another trillion parameters bro i promise the next trillion will solve continual learning

@rettooooo i think it would be very powerful if everyone had a top floor luxury penthouse in manhattan

@willccbb Hard to argue with that, more data and training really does seem to be the winning formula.

@willccbb Yeah, dude - don’t worry about slowing down and actually doing your work. You’ll never have to even do the work with the new model, bro.

@willccbb Doesn't matter. Egypt won

@willccbb To vaguepost or to not vaguepost

@willccbb 😂😂

@willccbb In-context learning is great until your context window fills up, costs spike, and latency kills the product.
Then fine-tuning starts looking pretty good.