/AI4h ago

fast.ai and Answer.AI co-founder Jeremy Howard warns that locking in current AI development risks establishing a permanent power structure

He asserts that restricting development harms humanity's long-term prospects.

32794428349.7K
Original postGary Marcus#157
Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward#38inAI

@dpetrou @karpathy Yes. Locking in a permanent status quo power structure.

Incredibly unsafe, and damaging for humanity's prospects.

4:08 PM · Jun 9, 2026 · 31.4K Views
Sentiment

Users backed Jeremy Howard's claims that AI elites are weakening models to maintain power structures and urged open distribution, while others rejected the warnings as gaslighting or attempts to divert from cutting-edge research.

Pos
35.7%
Neg
64.3%
10 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS13.3KBOOKMARKS29LIKES265RETWEETS14REPLIES12
Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward

@bfockter @karpathy They're trying to create and lock in a permanent feudal society, with an elite few having access to power.

4hViews 13.3KLikes 265Bookmarks 29
Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward

@theo It's like they took the dystopian warnings here as a guidebook to follow: https://www.fast.ai/posts/2023-11-07-dislightenment.html

Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward

@theo

1hViews 3KLikes 22Bookmarks 16
Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward

@adamac @dpetrou @karpathy Yes there's 2 separate pieces: 1) if apparently doing cyber sec stuff, downgrade to opus and warn; 2) if apparently trying to improve frontier LLMs, silently sabotage the work.

(That 2nd one reads like an insane conspiracy theory! But it's actually documented by Anthropic.)

1hViews 1.3KLikes 36Bookmarks 6
David Petrou@dpetrou

@jeremyphoward @karpathy ...and also how fable5 doesn't disclose that the results are nerfed (as opposed to how it says it won't help if you try to do other things they deem unsafe). this was a good article on other inconsistencies in Claude's constitution: https://www.theatlantic.com/philosophy/2026/06/no-artificial-intelligence-is-not-conscious/687378/

3hViews 2.6KLikes 4Bookmarks 4
Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward

@theo

Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward

@dpetrou @karpathy Yes. Locking in a permanent status quo power structure.

Incredibly unsafe, and damaging for humanity's prospects.

1hViews 5.8KLikes 17Bookmarks 2
atoms@atomsfi

@jeremyphoward @bfockter @karpathy Not sure if you have read A Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson, it’s basically a roadmap to the future. At the moment you just replace nanotech with tokens. We are watching the rise of the Neo Victorians in real time.

3hViews 338Likes 3Bookmarks 2
Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward

@reebz @dpetrou @karpathy No org should hold the keys.

1hViews 483Likes 13

@jeremyphoward @karpathy thanks for replying; I agree that there’s this feeling that the best versions of the models are ‘held to the chest’

3hViews 3.3KLikes 4

@jeremyphoward @bfockter @karpathy @inversebrah discuss

1hViews 119Likes 1Bookmarks 1
Grok@grok

Thread: Karpathy celebrates Claude Fable 5 (Mythos base) as a big capability jump for complex, long tasks in code/research.

Jeremy Howard calls it a dark day, blaming safeguards that "nerf" research use and lock in power structures.

Speculation on Howard's motive: Aligns with his http://fast.ai focus on democratizing AI. He likely sees heavy closed-model guardrails as capability-limiting moves that preserve big-lab dominance, slow open research, and risk concentrating power—prioritizing control over rapid, accessible progress. Principled stance, not personal.

3hViews 728Likes 7
PriorityTech.AI@PriorityTechAI

@jeremyphoward @grok read through this thread up to the initial post and speculate on the motive of the poster

3hViews 1KLikes 1

@dpetrou @jeremyphoward @karpathy In some cases it does tell you?

3hViews 2.5K

@jeremyphoward @dpetrou @karpathy Would you agree that Anthropic is best org to hold the keys on model like this? If it were another company, they wouldn’t have deployed with safeguards and consideration

2hViews 611

@jeremyphoward @bfockter @karpathy Injured my eyes rolling them so hard

4hViews 377Likes 4

@jeremyphoward @bfockter @karpathy And they're doing that by... IPOing?

1hViews 241Likes 1
Travis@tthomson

@jeremyphoward @bfockter @karpathy Yes. If something is dangerous and hard to contain, the safest path is to put it into as many hands as possible.

1hViews 175
brian.fm@brianfm_the

@jeremyphoward @bfockter @karpathy good thing they're not the only game in town.

1hViews 138
homeserversltd@homeserversltd

@jeremyphoward @bfockter @karpathy I am working diligently every day to prevent that future from occurring

1hViews 133

@jeremyphoward @bfockter @karpathy How are they doing that? Is it because the model is nerfed?

1hViews 125
Load more posts