Reaction

The claim that ICLR, ICML and NeurIPS fix acceptance rates around 25%

A user thinks too few people have seriously considered why these conferences don't accept every good paper.

LB

MA

2 Sources, 4h ago, first seen 4h ago

TLDR

A user claims ICLR, ICML and NeurIPS fix their acceptance rates at roughly 25% rather than accept every good paper. They think few people have seriously considered why.

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

Combined views

13.2K

2 Sources, first seen 4h ago

likes

2 Sources

@maksym_andri think not many people have seriously thought about why ICLR/ICML/NeurIPS don't just accept all good papers, but always fix the acceptance rate at ~25%.4h

@srchvrsThis is false. A *LOT* of people seriously thought about it. This is I believe one reason that ICLR acceptance rates are a tad higher than ICML/NEURIPS. This the reason why CL* conferences have a Findings track.3h

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

Combined views

13.2K

2 Sources, first seen 4h ago

53 likes

53

8 comments

9 saves

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Featured Source

8 comments

9 saves

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

2 Sources

@maksym_andri think not many people have seriously thought about why ICLR/ICML/NeurIPS don't just accept all good papers, but always fix the acceptance rate at ~25%.4h

@srchvrsThis is false. A *LOT* of people seriously thought about it. This is I believe one reason that ICLR acceptance rates are a tad higher than ICML/NEURIPS. This the reason why CL* conferences have a Findings track.3h

2 Sources

@maksym_andri think not many people have seriously thought about why ICLR/ICML/NeurIPS don't just accept all good papers, but always fix the acceptance rate at ~25%.4h

@srchvrsThis is false. A *LOT* of people seriously thought about it. This is I believe one reason that ICLR acceptance rates are a tad higher than ICML/NEURIPS. This the reason why CL* conferences have a Findings track.3h

2 Sources

@maksym_andri think not many people have seriously thought about why ICLR/ICML/NeurIPS don't just accept all good papers, but always fix the acceptance rate at ~25%.4h

@srchvrsThis is false. A *LOT* of people seriously thought about it. This is I believe one reason that ICLR acceptance rates are a tad higher than ICML/NEURIPS. This the reason why CL* conferences have a Findings track.3h

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet