The argument that bioweapons would remain a significant risk even if AI progress stopped
The post calls for better preparedness against bioweapons, arguing that views on AI should have little bearing on how people think about biodefense.
TLDR
A post argues that the case for better biodefense does not depend on continued AI progress. Even if that progress stopped, the author says, bioweapons would remain a significant risk that we are unprepared for—and that should change.
Combined views
114
2 Sources, first seen 19d ago
57 reposts