• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    The case for stronger biodefense as AI advances

    An essay calls for using AI to detect biological threats and develop countermeasures, arguing that cheaper, more accessible systems make stronger defenses necessary.

    Arvind NarayananAN
    delianDE
    Josh WolfeJW
    11 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    A post argues that more capable AI models will increase biological risk, saying the magnitude is fiercely debated but the direction is not. Its linked essay argues that efforts to slow AI miss the larger point: powerful systems will keep becoming cheaper and more widely accessible. It advocates using the same AI breakthroughs to detect threats, develop countermeasures and stop outbreaks before they become pandemics.

    Combined views

    63.7K

    11 Sources, first seen 21d ago

    Combined views

    63.7K

    11 Sources, first seen 21d ago

    327 likes
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    21d ago
    first seen 21d ago
    327 likes
    25 comments
    87 saves
    132 reposts
    25 comments
    87 saves
    132 reposts

    11 Sources

    Kathleen McMahon@kath_mcmahonWe cannot assume that as biorisk grows, our defenses will spontaneously mature in lockstep. That takes dedicated people, policy, and development. We should be racing to use advances in AI to mitigate today’s threats—the known, natural kind—and build resilience for a new era of risk.21d
    delian@zebulgarRT @velvetatom: More capable models will introduce increased biological risk. The magnitude is fiercely debated, the direction is not. We…21d
    Olivia H. Scharfman@OliviaHelenSYour position on AI should not affect your support for biodefense measures. Even if you do not think AI will make a difference, the problem is urgent today.21d
    Ramez Naam@ramezYes. Bio-risk exists today, from zoonotic outbreaks, accidents, and bio-terror. We know a great many things we can and should do to increase societal resilience, and have done almost none. Independent of how AI changes the risk, we should be doing the basics here. 1. Pathogen detection in waste streams, water supplies, and perhaps even indoor air. 2. Proactive design of template vaccines for every known virus family. 3. Pre-build vaccine manufacturing capability to have on standby. 4. Physical countermeasures: UV in the HVACs of all large buildings, airports, etc..; Stockpiling PPE. 5. R&D into new approaches like PCANS and other techniques that block viral transmission. These are all no-regret bio-defense policies that increase our resilience to natural pandemics, lab leaks, or intentional bio-attacks (AI augmented or not). Defense in depth.21d
    clare ❤️‍🔥@clarejtbirchRT @OliviaHelenS: Your position on AI should not affect your support for biodefense measures. Even if you do not think AI will make a diffe…21d
    Annie Jacobsen@AnnieJacobsenA 3rd dimension to the AI-enabled bio debate: How AI can also develop countermeasures, detect threats, and develop tools to (try and) stop an outbreak in the first critical hours. For BIOLOGICAL WAR: A SCENARIO, I interviewed computational neuroscientist Tess van Stekelenburg. This is her take on where we are now.21d
    Josh Wolfe@wolfejoshLux partner @velvetatom And biodefense in an AI world @ValthosTech21d
    Arvind Narayanan@random_walkerRT @ramez: Yes. Bio-risk exists today, from zoonotic outbreaks, accidents, and bio-terror. We know a great many things we can and should do…20d

    Sentiment

    Positive68.2%31.8%Negative

    Based on 45 sentiment-bearing replies from 22 accounts across 4 conversations.

    Sentiment

    Positive68.2%31.8%Negative

    Based on 45 sentiment-bearing replies from 22 accounts across 4 conversations.

    11 Sources

    Kathleen McMahon@kath_mcmahonWe cannot assume that as biorisk grows, our defenses will spontaneously mature in lockstep. That takes dedicated people, policy, and development. We should be racing to use advances in AI to mitigate today’s threats—the known, natural kind—and build resilience for a new era of risk.21d
    delian@zebulgarRT @velvetatom: More capable models will introduce increased biological risk. The magnitude is fiercely debated, the direction is not. We…21d
    Olivia H. Scharfman@OliviaHelenSYour position on AI should not affect your support for biodefense measures. Even if you do not think AI will make a difference, the problem is urgent today.21d
    Ramez Naam@ramezYes. Bio-risk exists today, from zoonotic outbreaks, accidents, and bio-terror. We know a great many things we can and should do to increase societal resilience, and have done almost none. Independent of how AI changes the risk, we should be doing the basics here. 1. Pathogen detection in waste streams, water supplies, and perhaps even indoor air. 2. Proactive design of template vaccines for every known virus family. 3. Pre-build vaccine manufacturing capability to have on standby. 4. Physical countermeasures: UV in the HVACs of all large buildings, airports, etc..; Stockpiling PPE. 5. R&D into new approaches like PCANS and other techniques that block viral transmission. These are all no-regret bio-defense policies that increase our resilience to natural pandemics, lab leaks, or intentional bio-attacks (AI augmented or not). Defense in depth.21d
    clare ❤️‍🔥@clarejtbirchRT @OliviaHelenS: Your position on AI should not affect your support for biodefense measures. Even if you do not think AI will make a diffe…21d
    Annie Jacobsen@AnnieJacobsenA 3rd dimension to the AI-enabled bio debate: How AI can also develop countermeasures, detect threats, and develop tools to (try and) stop an outbreak in the first critical hours. For BIOLOGICAL WAR: A SCENARIO, I interviewed computational neuroscientist Tess van Stekelenburg. This is her take on where we are now.21d
    Josh Wolfe@wolfejoshLux partner @velvetatom And biodefense in an AI world @ValthosTech21d
    Arvind Narayanan@random_walkerRT @ramez: Yes. Bio-risk exists today, from zoonotic outbreaks, accidents, and bio-terror. We know a great many things we can and should do…20d