/AI20h ago

Donald Trump evaluates proposals for the US government to establish partnerships with major AI companies

Trump plans to host discussions with AI executives soon.

3231.5K333185213.8K
Sentiment

Many users rejected Trump's proposed government stakes or partnerships in leading AI companies as insane or unwanted ownership, while others viewed it positively as a way to boost public involvement and economic growth.

Pos
32.6%
Neg
67.4%
89 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
VIEWS36KBOOKMARKS59RETWEETS90REPLIES35
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

⚠️⚠️ Seismic shift ⚠️⚠️

It’s a good day to be Mistral.

Nobody is going to trust an American AI company that is partly owned by the US Government.

Just the way the US doesn’t trust Huawei.

After this meeting, everything is going to change.

I don’t think either Washington or Silicon Valley has really thought this through.

The Washington Post@washingtonpost

President Trump said he is considering taking a government stake in leading artificial intelligence companies.

Industry leaders will soon gather at the White House to discuss the idea, the president said. https://wapo.st/4e28MbJ

10hViews 36KLikes 447Bookmarks 59
LIKES453
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

smells like bailout. smells like garbage. 🤮

The Washington Post@washingtonpost

President Trump said he is considering taking a government stake in leading artificial intelligence companies.

Industry leaders will soon gather at the White House to discuss the idea, the president said. https://wapo.st/4e28MbJ

10hViews 14.9KLikes 453Bookmarks 12

When gov’t owns / controls the means of production it is socialism. I don’t trust shares in the hands of some future politicians that can coerce or liquidate & spend on whatever their political beliefs. If purchased or donated the shares should be directly held by American citizens through their @TrumpAccounts or in a pooled Trust / Trump Acct that will be divided among citizens in the future. 🇺🇸🚀

1hViews 15.2KLikes 160Bookmarks 12
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

You can’t let this happen, @DavidSacks, cc @elonmusk.

It’s WWWIII but with AI. Nobody wins.

Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

⚠️⚠️ Seismic shift ⚠️⚠️

It’s a good day to be Mistral.

Nobody is going to trust an American AI company that is partly owned by the US Government.

Just the way the US doesn’t trust Huawei.

After this meeting, everything is going to change.

I don’t think either Washington or Silicon Valley has really thought this through.

10hViews 8.7KLikes 38Bookmarks 10
Uncensored.AI@GoUncensored

@washingtonpost There's a term for this, and it's bailout.

16hViews 680Likes 74
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

Trump Administration is in talks for U.S. Got stake in top AI labs. "there is so much money & it's so big that there are concepts where pieces could be given to the American public, where the American public becomes a partner with the companies."

53mViews 1.9KLikes 7Bookmarks 3
John Jackson@hissgoescobra

@washingtonpost @lumiere2016 Beyond the fact, this is pure communism, there’s another fundamental problem: how the is the government supposed to diligently regulate a company that it has a huge financial interest in? That’s a massive conflict of interest.

15hViews 426Likes 30

When gov’t owns / controls the means of production it is socialism. I don’t trust shares in the hands of some future politicians that can liquidate & spend on whatever their political beliefs. If purchased or donated the shares should be directly held by American citizens through their @TrumpAccounts or in a pooled Trust / Trump Acct that will be divided among citizens in the future. 🇺🇸🚀

1hViews 2.1KLikes 11Bookmarks 3
QuitGPT@quitchatgpt

@washingtonpost Trump when Trump uses AI to pump propaganda, surveil dissidents, and replace who he fires, but he also steals tax dollars to fund stakes in the companies, so he can extract more money for illegal wars and vanity projects while gutting services people actually need to stay alive:

15hViews 499Likes 7Bookmarks 1
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

FT: Trump administration, OpenAI discussing possible government stake in the AI startup.

OpenAI has already floated a Public Wealth Fund, which would hold long-term assets and potentially pass AI-related gains back to citizens. It will be a government-backed vehicle outside the company.

OpenAI said the fund could “invest in diversified, long-term assets” and would enable citizens to participate in the “upside” of AI growth, possibly by receiving the fund’s returns directly

Theres a huge political angle: voters fear job loss, data-center costs, and corporate control, while AI companies need Washington’s support for infrastructure, procurement, and regulation.

For some context, The Trump administration has already taken stakes in Intel, IBM and other quantum and critical mineral companies during the president’s second term.

---

ft .com/content/b1ab6106-77e6-4218-9eb4-e44bd56ca400?syn-25a6b1a6=1

38mViews 717Likes 4Bookmarks 2
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus

⚠️⚠️⚠️

It’s a good day to be Mistral.

Nobody is going to trust an American AI company that is partly owned by the US Government.

Just the way the US doesn’t trust Huawei.

After this meeting, everything is going to change.

The Washington Post@washingtonpost

President Trump said he is considering taking a government stake in leading artificial intelligence companies.

Industry leaders will soon gather at the White House to discuss the idea, the president said. https://wapo.st/4e28MbJ

10hViews 561Likes 4Bookmarks 0
Nani Aloha@NaniAloha99

@washingtonpost conflicts of interest mean nothing to this man! The fuckery in the last 3 days has been UNBELIEVABLE !! from congress to the white house! Are we even seen as people anymore or just TAX$$$$$?

15hViews 212Likes 9
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

FT: Trump administration, OpenAI discussing possible government stake in the AI startup.

OpenAI has already floated a Public Wealth Fund, which would hold long-term assets and potentially pass AI-related gains back to citizens. It will be a government-backed vehicle outside the company.

OpenAI said the fund could “invest in diversified, long-term assets” and would enable citizens to participate in the “upside” of AI growth, possibly by receiving the fund’s returns directly

Theres a huge political angle: voters fear job loss, data-center costs, and corporate control, while AI companies need Washington’s support for infrastructure, procurement, and regulation.

For some context, The Trump administration has already taken stakes in Intel, IBM and other quantum and critical mineral companies during the president’s second term.

---

ft .com/content/b1ab6106-77e6-4218-9eb4-e44bd56ca400?syn-25a6b1a6=1

Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

Trump Administration is in talks for U.S. Got stake in top AI labs. "there is so much money & it's so big that there are concepts where pieces could be given to the American public, where the American public becomes a partner with the companies."

38mViews 1.5KLikes 6Bookmarks 0
Eric Conklin@EricConk32

@GaryMarcus The issue isn’t just ownership. It’s the trust model. Once the state has a stake in the company building the intelligence layer, every foreign customer has to ask whether they are buying a product or importing a geopolitical dependency.

10hViews 266Likes 6
Matthew Donnelly@m_donnelly4u

@washingtonpost That’s communism. For all the brain dead right wingers out there constantly screaming that word when it doesn’t apply. Your messiah has provided you with a real example.

13hViews 73Likes 3

Recent reporting has found that Trump has abused his access and position to execute stock trades in companies the government has taken ownership stakes in at his personal request. The AI industry is expanding globally and Trump is likely looking to make a profit there too. All of this is of course illegal and Trump will certainly be prosecuted for insider trading.

16hViews 273Likes 3
John Jackson@hissgoescobra

@washingtonpost @lumiere2016 Communist.

15hViews 156Likes 9
Grouchy Marx@ecobard

@washingtonpost He only wants to do that so he can grift it.

5hViews 33Likes 2
Jameson@Jameson34365076

@washingtonpost It’s Bernie Sanders+Trump plan, both left and right. Stock donation to charity is a sort of AI tax. Gov took a stake in Intel but Intel is not nationalized. Concern over corporate-government fusion is reasonable. Hopefully only a few companies are affected.

13hViews 63Bookmarks 1
Load more posts