Home
Technology
Gaming
Entertainment
World & Business
Science
Sports
AI

World & Business

Home
Technology
Gaming
Entertainment
World & Business
Science
Sports
AI

Jev's pitch for machine-native AI built for software · Digg

Jev's pitch for machine-native AI built for software

A post shares a conversation with TypeSafe's CEO about developer controls, copycats and the limits of AI benchmarks.

TLDR

One month after Jev's launch, a post shares a conversation with TypeSafe's CEO about the company's machine-native AI pitch. Topics include using probabilities and thresholds for developer control, automating email with if-statements instead of giant prompts, and why the company builds its training data in-house.

Combined views

2K

1 Source, first seen 2h ago

Combined views

2K

1 Source, first seen 2h ago

23 likes

2h ago

first seen 2h ago

23 likes

4 comments

10 saves

3 reposts

4 comments

10 saves

3 reposts

Featured Source

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

Today's Rank

—

Not ranked yet

1 Source

@mattturckCrazy launch! Copycats! Massive round! On the one-month anniversary of the launch of Jev, we unpack it all with @CompleteSkeptic, CEO of @typesafeai: what Jev is, how it fixes what's broken in AI, and why the fast-followers are missing the hard part. 00:00 “95% Einstein, 5% Mr. Bean” 1:09 Why intelligence per dollar matters 3:25 Why TypeSafe built in stealth for two years 5:50 “We could have had AGI last year” 6:48 Why the product carries the marketing 9:33 What is Jev? Machine-native AI, built for software 10:53 System One vs. System Two 12:26 From simple decisions to composable AI 15:21 Automating email: giant prompts vs. smart if-statements 20:03 Probabilities, thresholds, and developer control 23:43 Why Jev is faster and cheaper than chat models 25:39 “Classification is AI-complete” 27:16 RLHF: how OpenAI trained models to please humans 31:28 Sycophancy, refusals, and the hidden costs of RLHF 34:22 RLVR: why benchmark gains don’t mean reliable automation 37:51 RLCD: optimizing for machine-native intelligence 39:54 Why TypeSafe builds its training data in-house 41:49 The Bitterest Lesson: define the task before scaling 44:39 Building Jev from open-weight models 45:56 Is Jev just a classifier? Why that’s a compliment 48:35 “Build prod, not God” 50:11 Embedding AI in software, beyond coding assistants 53:05 Jev’s copycats: matching the interface vs. the intelligence 55:33 Why benchmarks mislead the users they should help 58:37 Open weights vs. APIs: how TypeSafe weighs the tradeoff 1:00:04 Jevons paradox: a new market for machine intelligence 1:02:50 Why Diogo is skeptical of recursive self-improvement 1:04:47 Can practical automation avert an AI winter?2h