• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Reaction

    Can researchers show their AI-assisted work was independent?

    A post asks how researchers could rule out an AI agent having seen an arXiv paper posted days earlier.

    DP
    FT
    2 Sources, 4h ago, first seen 4h ago

    TLDR

    One post questions whether AI agents will make it harder to establish “concurrent work” in research: even if researchers say their result was independent, an agent might have encountered a recently posted paper. A reply notes that humans, too, can be influenced by sources they cannot identify or explain.

    Combined views

    976

    2 Sources, first seen 4h ago

    Combined views

    976

    2 Sources, first seen 4h ago

    12 likes
    12 likes
    1 comments
    Featured Source
    1 comments

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    #15

    Today's Rank

    #15

    2 Sources

    @DimitrisPapail@florian_tramer Kinda true for humans as well. there’s a lot of subconscious or hard to point sources of influence that people can’t even properly verbalize.4h
    @florian_tramer@DimitrisPapail Right, for humans we mostly rely on reputations of honesty. The problem is that even if you're honest, you can never be truly sure your AI didn't see the concurrent result Even if you inspect all traces the search results and reasoning are encrypted3h

    2 Sources

    @DimitrisPapail@florian_tramer Kinda true for humans as well. there’s a lot of subconscious or hard to point sources of influence that people can’t even properly verbalize.4h
    @florian_tramer@DimitrisPapail Right, for humans we mostly rely on reputations of honesty. The problem is that even if you're honest, you can never be truly sure your AI didn't see the concurrent result Even if you inspect all traces the search results and reasoning are encrypted3h