In a new Stanford study, law professors by far preferred Gemini 2.5 Pro's responses over those written by their peers when they were unaware of who wrote the answers.
11:02 AM · Jun 2, 2026 · 176.2K Views
Blinded study finds law professors prefer Gemini 2.5 Pro answers to human peer responses 75.33% of the time
AI was flagged harmful 3.53% of the time versus 12.06%.
--0--
Sentiment
Sentiment building, check back later.
Cluster Engagement
-
Views
-
Comments
-
Reposts
-
Bookmarks
Expand data
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most ActivityTimeline
VIEWS70.4KBOOKMARKS238LIKES661RETWEETS91REPLIES27
Ethan Mollick@emollick
Law professors wrote questions they were asked during office hours. Gemini 2.5 & humans answered them then other law professors blindly judged the results: -Gemini had a 75% win rate vs. professors -Gemini's answers were rated LESS harmful than humans -Newer models do even better
Andrew Curran@AndrewCurran_
In a new Stanford study, law professors by far preferred Gemini 2.5 Pro's responses over those written by their peers when they were unaware of who wrote the answers.
9hViews 70.4KLikes 661Bookmarks 238