A post quotes Elena Verna saying an IC can drive more impact than a manager could in the pre-AI system.
A post shares Elena Verna’s argument that if AI is changing how people work, individual contributors should be paid more than managers. She says an IC can drive more impact than a manager could in the pre-AI system.
77.7K
2 Sources, first seen ago
—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet
@lennysan“If we truly believe that AI is changing how we work, then ICs should get paid more than managers, because an IC can drive more impact than a manager could in the pre-AI system.” — @ElenaVerna
@garrytanLogical: in the future ICs with agents will be more productive and create better outcomes than equivalent people managers from prior eras@lennysan“If we truly believe that AI is changing how we work, then ICs should get paid more than managers, because an IC can drive more impact than a manager could in the pre-AI system.” — @ElenaVerna@garrytanLogical: in the future ICs with agents will be more productive and create better outcomes than equivalent people managers from prior eras@lennysan“If we truly believe that AI is changing how we work, then ICs should get paid more than managers, because an IC can drive more impact than a manager could in the pre-AI system.” — @ElenaVerna@garrytanLogical: in the future ICs with agents will be more productive and create better outcomes than equivalent people managers from prior eras@lennysan“If we truly believe that AI is changing how we work, then ICs should get paid more than managers, because an IC can drive more impact than a manager could in the pre-AI system.” — @ElenaVerna@garrytanLogical: in the future ICs with agents will be more productive and create better outcomes than equivalent people managers from prior eras
