A post argues that even collaborating frontier labs could not set the pace of open-source AI.
In a follow-up to an earlier post, the author argues that the AI industry should focus on benefits while delivering the technology safely, securely and at pace. They say open source cannot be paced even if some frontier labs collaborate.
—
3 Sources, first seen ago
—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet
@nikesharoraYou should read my sequel to the ninja move post. I suggested that the original ninja move could actually backfire if we didn't change our approach as an industry to focus on benefits and instead turn to delivering this technology safely, securely yet still at pace. It is not possible to pace open source even if you got some frontier labs to collaborate switch would continue to define the pace.
@rohanpaul_aiThe White House AI czar Jay Clayton on CNBC: Slowing AI down for safety gets it backwards "People talk about balance and it's kind of like, well, I have to slow it down in order to have safety. It's actually the other way around. You have to develop technologies in a way that promotes safety. And that's what can be done here." ---- Full video on "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)@nikesharoraYou should read my sequel to the ninja move post. I suggested that the original ninja move could actually backfire if we didn't change our approach as an industry to focus on benefits and instead turn to delivering this technology safely, securely yet still at pace. It is not possible to pace open source even if you got some frontier labs to collaborate switch would continue to define the pace.@rohanpaul_aiThe White House AI czar Jay Clayton on CNBC: Slowing AI down for safety gets it backwards "People talk about balance and it's kind of like, well, I have to slow it down in order to have safety. It's actually the other way around. You have to develop technologies in a way that promotes safety. And that's what can be done here." ---- Full video on "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)@nikesharoraYou should read my sequel to the ninja move post. I suggested that the original ninja move could actually backfire if we didn't change our approach as an industry to focus on benefits and instead turn to delivering this technology safely, securely yet still at pace. It is not possible to pace open source even if you got some frontier labs to collaborate switch would continue to define the pace.@rohanpaul_aiThe White House AI czar Jay Clayton on CNBC: Slowing AI down for safety gets it backwards "People talk about balance and it's kind of like, well, I have to slow it down in order to have safety. It's actually the other way around. You have to develop technologies in a way that promotes safety. And that's what can be done here." ---- Full video on "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)@nikesharoraYou should read my sequel to the ninja move post. I suggested that the original ninja move could actually backfire if we didn't change our approach as an industry to focus on benefits and instead turn to delivering this technology safely, securely yet still at pace. It is not possible to pace open source even if you got some frontier labs to collaborate switch would continue to define the pace.@rohanpaul_aiThe White House AI czar Jay Clayton on CNBC: Slowing AI down for safety gets it backwards "People talk about balance and it's kind of like, well, I have to slow it down in order to have safety. It's actually the other way around. You have to develop technologies in a way that promotes safety. And that's what can be done here." ---- Full video on "CNBC Television" YouTube channel, (link in comment)
