Pangram Advocate Urges Context on V1 Study Results

Marzena Karpinska posted that results must be viewed in the context they were achieved. She objects to continued citations of Pangram v1 performance from an earlier study, noting a much stronger v4 now exists. She compares the situation to judging GPT-5.5 by what GPT-3.5 could not do, adding that the older version already performed well at the time. The post stresses that technology moves forward.