• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Kyle Russell Calls Fable 5.1 Safeguards Annoying

    Kyle Russell reports early friction with Fable 5.1 safeguards in public post.

    GK
    KR
    M🪐
    6 Sources, 29d ago, first seen 29d ago

    TLDR

    Kyle Russell, a product engineer at Valon who leads internal AI deployment and previously founded Playbyte, stated that day one safeguards for Fable 5.1 have been more annoying so far. The comment appears in visible posts on X and links to a tweet by Greg Kamradt. The packet records this remark and Russell's professional background without further details on the tool or rollout.

    Combined views

    49.4K

    6 Sources, first seen 29d ago

    Combined views

    49.4K

    6 Sources, first seen 29d ago

    288 likes
    288 likes
    33 comments
    34 saves
    21 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    33 comments
    34 saves
    21 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    6 Sources

    @kylebrussellHad to rewrite prompts + memory for a Fable 5 session working on a theoretical math problem to drop a “military campaign” metaphor it adopted early on because it was setting off Fable 5.1 cyber safeguards
    @GregKamradtDuring v3 testing for Fable 5.1 many of our requests were getting rejected due to Anthropic's safety guards misclassifying them as "reverse engineering" We were in contact with the Anthropic team the whole time and they tried to lift the restrictions in time for launch but ultimately we weren't able to finish testing. We're looking forward to getting this out when we finish it. TBD on when that is.
    @niemergAn obvious improvement for safeguard approvals would be escalation to a more capable model for review at the user's request. @AnthropicAI
    @mattparlmerRT @niemerg: An obvious improvement for safeguard approvals would be escalation to a more capable model for review at the user's request. @…

    6 Sources

    @kylebrussellHad to rewrite prompts + memory for a Fable 5 session working on a theoretical math problem to drop a “military campaign” metaphor it adopted early on because it was setting off Fable 5.1 cyber safeguards
    @GregKamradtDuring v3 testing for Fable 5.1 many of our requests were getting rejected due to Anthropic's safety guards misclassifying them as "reverse engineering" We were in contact with the Anthropic team the whole time and they tried to lift the restrictions in time for launch but ultimately we weren't able to finish testing. We're looking forward to getting this out when we finish it. TBD on when that is.
    @niemergAn obvious improvement for safeguard approvals would be escalation to a more capable model for review at the user's request. @AnthropicAI
    @mattparlmerRT @niemerg: An obvious improvement for safeguard approvals would be escalation to a more capable model for review at the user's request. @…