Researchers rarely accept theories outside their preferred mathematical languages.
When someone says "we need theory of deep learning", note that probably nothing will "count" as a theory of deep learning unless it is *their* theory, or unless it is speaking a language, and using techniques, that they already have a bias towards.
When someone says "we need theory of deep learning", note that probably nothing will "count" as a theory of deep learning unless it is *their* theory, or unless it is speaking a language, and using techniques, that they already have a bias towards.
Researchers rarely accept theories outside their preferred mathematical languages.
When someone says "we need theory of deep learning", note that probably nothing will "count" as a theory of deep learning unless it is *their* theory, or unless it is speaking a language, and using techniques, that they already have a bias towards.
When someone says "we need theory of deep learning", note that probably nothing will "count" as a theory of deep learning unless it is *their* theory, or unless it is speaking a language, and using techniques, that they already have a bias towards.
