• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Reaction

    The case for robots cheap enough to replace every two years

    A post argues that robots should pay for themselves and cost little enough to replace every two years.

    AM
    2 Sources, 2h ago, first seen 2h ago

    TLDR

    A post argues that massive scale will win in robotics if robots are useful enough to pay for themselves but cheap enough to replace every two years. Comparing the approach to cell phones, the author calls for getting millions of robots into the world, learning what needs improvement and building new versions for the next 10 to 15 generations.

    Combined views

    7.5K

    2 Sources, first seen 2h ago

    Combined views

    7.5K

    2 Sources, first seen 2h ago

    68 likes
    68 likes
    5 comments
    10 saves
    1 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Featured Source
    5 comments
    10 saves
    1 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    2 Sources

    @andrewmccalipI think this is directionally correct, massive scale will win. The robots need to be cheap enough to throw away. Cell phones gave us a pretty good template. You want the economics to let you churn through hardware generations as fast as you can figure out how to make them better. Useful enough to pay for themselves, cheap enough to replace every two years. We should be targeting that for the next 10 to 15 generations. Get millions of them into the world, learn what sucks, build the next version.

    2 Sources

    @andrewmccalipI think this is directionally correct, massive scale will win. The robots need to be cheap enough to throw away. Cell phones gave us a pretty good template. You want the economics to let you churn through hardware generations as fast as you can figure out how to make them better. Useful enough to pay for themselves, cheap enough to replace every two years. We should be targeting that for the next 10 to 15 generations. Get millions of them into the world, learn what sucks, build the next version.