Reaction
The case for robots cheap enough to replace every two years
A post argues that robots should pay for themselves and cost little enough to replace every two years.
TLDR
A post argues that massive scale will win in robotics if robots are useful enough to pay for themselves but cheap enough to replace every two years. Comparing the approach to cell phones, the author calls for getting millions of robots into the world, learning what needs improvement and building new versions for the next 10 to 15 generations.
Combined views
—
2 Sources, first seen ago
