AI commentary, academic expertise and who gets heard
One post compares AI discourse to climate change and evolution, arguing that Substack writers’ technical claims can be louder than scholarly voices.
TLDR
In a sarcastic critique, one post calls AI “the new Climate Change and Evolution combined.” It argues that Substack writers can offer louder “technical facts/predictions” than someone with a “scholar page,” criticizing the gap between expertise and volume in AI commentary.
AI commentary, academic expertise and who gets heard
One post compares AI discourse to climate change and evolution, arguing that Substack writers’ technical claims can be louder than scholarly voices.
TLDR
In a sarcastic critique, one post calls AI “the new Climate Change and Evolution combined.” It argues that Substack writers can offer louder “technical facts/predictions” than someone with a “scholar page,” criticizing the gap between expertise and volume in AI commentary.