AI commentary, academic expertise and who gets heard
One post compares AI discourse to climate change and evolution, arguing that Substack writers’ technical claims can be louder than scholarly voices.
TLDR
In a sarcastic critique, one post calls AI “the new Climate Change and Evolution combined.” It argues that Substack writers can offer louder “technical facts/predictions” than someone with a “scholar page,” criticizing the gap between expertise and volume in AI commentary.
Combined views
925
1 Source, first seen ago
