Reaction
The view that the mind is computable but LLMs cannot reason
In a reply, a user calls symbolic-neural fusion a desirable path and puts his P(doom) close to zero.
TLDR
A user says he has reason to believe the mind is computable, but considers large language models incapable of reasoning and unreliable narrators at best. He favors combining symbolic and neural models, calls current frontier models valuable yet dangerous, and fears billionaires and companies that promote a superintelligence narrative to gain power and control. He does not think replicating the mind is imminent and puts his P(doom) close to zero.
Combined views
—
2 Sources, first seen ago