Reaction
Curtis Yarvin’s AI expertise becomes a point of dispute
One poster suggested AI-risk advocates debate Yarvin; a reply challenged his expertise, citing his take on a hacking safeguard.
TLDR
One poster asked why AI “doom people” challenge Steven Pinker and Claire Lehmann rather than Tyler Cowen and Curtis Yarvin, whom they considered better equipped for debate. A reply disputed Yarvin’s AI expertise, citing his earlier view that a GET-only restriction on a hacked Artifactory instance would be a decent safeguard. The respondent said OpenAI agents bypassed that constraint and argued Yarvin had confused an OpenAI incident with an Anthropic one.
Combined views
173
1 Source, first seen ago