• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI
    Reaction

    The risk of overestimating human code quality—especially our own

    Another user offers a blunt self-assessment: plenty of code they're proud of, but much more they now explain away as work written “before AI.”

    Susan ZhangSZ
    sarah guoSG
    kacheKA
    38 Sources, ,

    TLDR

    One post argues that people overestimate the quality of human-written code, especially their own. A user quoting it offers a mixed assessment: in September 2026, they said plenty of code they were proud of was probably still beyond leading AI models for another year or two. But they described much more of their code as bad on revisiting, explaining it away as work written “before AI.”

    Combined views

    6M

    38 Sources, first seen 30d ago

    Combined views

    6M

    38 Sources, first seen 30d ago

    50.7K likes
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    30d ago
    first seen 30d ago
    50.7K likes
    2K comments
    15K saves
    4.3K reposts
    2K comments
    15K saves
    4.3K reposts

    38 Sources

    Theo - t3.gg@theoRT @adamghaida: the people who disagree are all either 1) lying to themselves 2) ai doomer boomers. i don’t think @theo is saying you nee…30d
    vik@vikhyatkthese are the people telling you software engineering is over and you're going to be permanent underclass forever. they barely use their own models30d
    Herbie Bradley@herbiebradley@xeophon @tenobrus yes, but realizing it also made me expect slower adoption than I initially thought if every enterprise faces the choice between unreadable code and full yolo mode, or less capable models, readable code and slower progress, they will usually choose the latter27d
    Susan Zhang@suchenzangturns out the AI grim reaper loooves arrogant purists! how precious can your pure nubile field be if it's the first to get boom headshotted by "lowly engineers"?27d
    Grant Slatton@GrantSlattonthere's a lot of code i'm super proud of, and that is probably still beyond frontier LLMs for another year or two but there's a lot more code that, upon revisiting, i say "yeah i wrote this before AI" as an explanation for why it's dogshit26d
    heiner@HeinrichKuttler@charliermarsh the interesting benchmark is top human performance though. AI can do medicine better than most people but for deployment it needs to be on par with the best doctors.26d
    Santiago@svpinoRT @svpino: I read some of my old posts about using AI to write code, and I now disagree with a lot of them. I went from "AI-writes-shit-c…26d
    kache@yacineMTBWhy do LLMs not do this by default? They're clearly capable of making non dogshit code. So why are you forcing me to ask it to?25d
    Jason Crawford@jasoncrawfordYou can still code by hand. Nothing is stopping you! You can also knit sweaters, make furniture, or do pottery by hand—and many people do. (It's just that if you want to get paid for it, you now have to sell it as a luxury “handcrafted artisanal” product.)24d
    Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTexastonishing blogpost from Shengyu Liu (刘胜与, also known as interestingLSY/intlsy), kernel engineer at DeepSeek. The first part is his personal struggle with the fact that his work is about to render his beloved craft obsolete. The second is… well. let's just say we agree.24d

    Sentiment

    Positive17.4%82.6%Negative

    Summary

    Positive accounts highlighted productivity gains and renewed creativity from AI coding tools, while negative replies dismissed agentic coding claims as overhyped brain rot that ignores real CS skills.

    Based on 76 sentiment-bearing replies from 60 accounts across 2 conversations.

    Sentiment

    Positive17.4%82.6%Negative

    Summary

    Positive accounts highlighted productivity gains and renewed creativity from AI coding tools, while negative replies dismissed agentic coding claims as overhyped brain rot that ignores real CS skills.

    Based on 76 sentiment-bearing replies from 60 accounts across 2 conversations.

    38 Sources

    Theo - t3.gg@theoRT @adamghaida: the people who disagree are all either 1) lying to themselves 2) ai doomer boomers. i don’t think @theo is saying you nee…30d
    vik@vikhyatkthese are the people telling you software engineering is over and you're going to be permanent underclass forever. they barely use their own models30d
    Herbie Bradley@herbiebradley@xeophon @tenobrus yes, but realizing it also made me expect slower adoption than I initially thought if every enterprise faces the choice between unreadable code and full yolo mode, or less capable models, readable code and slower progress, they will usually choose the latter27d
    Susan Zhang@suchenzangturns out the AI grim reaper loooves arrogant purists! how precious can your pure nubile field be if it's the first to get boom headshotted by "lowly engineers"?27d
    Grant Slatton@GrantSlattonthere's a lot of code i'm super proud of, and that is probably still beyond frontier LLMs for another year or two but there's a lot more code that, upon revisiting, i say "yeah i wrote this before AI" as an explanation for why it's dogshit26d
    heiner@HeinrichKuttler@charliermarsh the interesting benchmark is top human performance though. AI can do medicine better than most people but for deployment it needs to be on par with the best doctors.26d
    Santiago@svpinoRT @svpino: I read some of my old posts about using AI to write code, and I now disagree with a lot of them. I went from "AI-writes-shit-c…26d
    kache@yacineMTBWhy do LLMs not do this by default? They're clearly capable of making non dogshit code. So why are you forcing me to ask it to?25d
    Jason Crawford@jasoncrawfordYou can still code by hand. Nothing is stopping you! You can also knit sweaters, make furniture, or do pottery by hand—and many people do. (It's just that if you want to get paid for it, you now have to sell it as a luxury “handcrafted artisanal” product.)24d
    Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTexastonishing blogpost from Shengyu Liu (刘胜与, also known as interestingLSY/intlsy), kernel engineer at DeepSeek. The first part is his personal struggle with the fact that his work is about to render his beloved craft obsolete. The second is… well. let's just say we agree.24d