• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    SchmidhuberAI accuses Nature of tolerating plagiarism in Geoffrey Hinton’s papers

    The account alleges Hinton’s Nature papers republished or misattributed fundamental techniques without citing their inventors, and says he was never required to retract or correct those papers.

    JS
    1 Source, ,

    TLDR

    In a September 3, 2026 post, @SchmidhuberAI accused Nature of tolerating plagiarism. The account alleged that Geoffrey Hinton’s papers in the journal republished or misattributed fundamental techniques invented by others without citing them, and that he had never been required to retract or correct the papers.

    Combined views

    29.3K

    1 Source, first seen 28d ago

    Combined views

    29.3K

    1 Source, first seen 28d ago

    120 likes
    28d ago
    first seen 28d ago
    120 likes
    6 comments
    20 saves
    7 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    6 comments
    20 saves
    7 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @SchmidhuberAI@elonmusk @Nature I agree. Nature tolerates plagiarism. Aside from the Jason Arday case: Geoffrey Hinton never had to retract or correct his Nature papers that republished/misattributed fundamental techniques invented by others whom he failed to cite

    1 Source

    @SchmidhuberAI@elonmusk @Nature I agree. Nature tolerates plagiarism. Aside from the Jason Arday case: Geoffrey Hinton never had to retract or correct his Nature papers that republished/misattributed fundamental techniques invented by others whom he failed to cite