Reaction
Meta's Muse Open License draws criticism over its restrictions
One critic cites Muse branding, a revenue gate and restricted-use rules; another compares it unfavorably with Llama 3.1.
TLDR
A critic calls Meta's Muse Open License “trash” and cites Muse branding, a revenue gate they consider reasonable, and restrictions on domains and authorized uses. They suggest those rules may also apply to models trained on AI outputs. Another commenter says the license is worse than Llama 3.1's, but notes that Meta dropped the Llama-era derivative-model naming requirement.
Combined views
6K
4 Sources, first seen ago
