• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Too many “pre-AGI” companies, one user argues

    The post favors building companies for a world after artificial general intelligence (AGI), rather than one before it.

    AL
    WB
    ZE
    3 Sources, 23d ago, first seen 23d ago

    TLDR

    “Way too many people” are building “pre-AGI companies” rather than “post-AGI companies,” one user writes, arguing for a shift in what founders build toward.

    Combined views

    419.5K

    3 Sources, first seen 23d ago

    4.5K likes

    Combined views

    419.5K

    3 Sources, first seen 23d ago

    4.5K likes
    269 comments
    1.5K saves
    446 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    269 comments
    1.5K saves
    446 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    3 Sources

    @willcbway too many people are building pre-agi companies rather than post-agi companies
    @levieGood reminder here that with rapidly accelerating AI progress, you should likely be building with a vision that contemplates at least a few orders of magnitude of capability improvement or token volume available to you. The best opportunities right now are those where you can value to customers today with things that are barely only possible, but with a full mission that feels nearly impossible with today’s tech. There are lots of products the require orders of magnitude more processing of data (and thus are barely economically viable ideas) or where model capabilities still are in their infancy relative to what’s needed to work. Best to be building for those scenarios.
    @zephyr_z9RT @willcb: way too many people are building pre-agi companies rather than post-agi companies

    3 Sources

    @willcbway too many people are building pre-agi companies rather than post-agi companies
    @levieGood reminder here that with rapidly accelerating AI progress, you should likely be building with a vision that contemplates at least a few orders of magnitude of capability improvement or token volume available to you. The best opportunities right now are those where you can value to customers today with things that are barely only possible, but with a full mission that feels nearly impossible with today’s tech. There are lots of products the require orders of magnitude more processing of data (and thus are barely economically viable ideas) or where model capabilities still are in their infancy relative to what’s needed to work. Best to be building for those scenarios.
    @zephyr_z9RT @willcb: way too many people are building pre-agi companies rather than post-agi companies