• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Hullman Distinguishes Journal Editors From Reviewers on AI Content

    Jessica Hullman clarifies differing roles of editors and reviewers on AI-generated prose policies.

    JH
    1 Source, 29d ago, first seen 29d ago

    TLDR

    Jessica Hullman posted that journal editors operate under policies often barring rejection of work solely for evidence of AI-generated prose. Reviewers face no such restriction and may direct their limited expert judgment as they choose. She advised that reviewers should exercise this autonomy. The reply addressed @technollama and referenced prior discussion of journal AI policies. No other details or outcomes appear in the packet.

    Combined views

    775

    1 Source, first seen 29d ago

    Combined views

    775

    1 Source, first seen 29d ago

    3 likes
    3 likes
    1 comments
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    1 comments
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @JessicaHullman@technollama The responsibility of a journal editor is different from that of a reviewer. As I mention, many journals have policies against rejecting on evidence of AI-generated prose alone. But reviewers can allocate their scarce expert judgment as they wish & should exercise that autonomy

    1 Source

    @JessicaHullman@technollama The responsibility of a journal editor is different from that of a reviewer. As I mention, many journals have policies against rejecting on evidence of AI-generated prose alone. But reviewers can allocate their scarce expert judgment as they wish & should exercise that autonomy