• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Atoosa Kasirzadeh Calls AI Safety Language Encrypted

    AI ethicist highlights barriers when discussing safety claims with outsiders.

    1 Source, 25d ago, first seen 25d ago

    TLDR

    Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Staff Research Scientist at Google DeepMind and CMU professor on leave, posted that part of the AI safety community has developed an almost encrypted language. She said discussing its claims with scientists and people outside the space often requires citing blog posts and mastering an insular vocabulary. Kasirzadeh added that she sometimes gets lost in the communication and called for insisting on clarity.

    Combined views

    —

    1 Source, first seen 25d ago

    Combined views

    —

    1 Source, first seen 25d ago

    — likes
    — likes
    — comments
    — saves
    — reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    — comments
    — saves
    — reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @Dr_AtoosaA part of the AI safety community has developed an almost encrypted language. To discuss its claims with scientists and people out of the community space, one is often expected to cite blog posts and master an insular vocabulary. It’s worth insisting on clarity here: I honestly sometimes get lost in communication. The lack of clarity does a disservice to AI governance. Not everything can be expressed with mathematical, scientific, or philosophical rigor. Still, it is worth keeping standards. Honestly, the lack of it is sometimes embarrassing. Whenever I raise such concerns, that fraction labels me as a “skeptic” or an “ethics person.” For the record, I was writing about reward hacking in 2021, and I have published research on existential risks from AI. And I do believe that AI safety is for everyone.

    1 Source

    @Dr_AtoosaA part of the AI safety community has developed an almost encrypted language. To discuss its claims with scientists and people out of the community space, one is often expected to cite blog posts and master an insular vocabulary. It’s worth insisting on clarity here: I honestly sometimes get lost in communication. The lack of clarity does a disservice to AI governance. Not everything can be expressed with mathematical, scientific, or philosophical rigor. Still, it is worth keeping standards. Honestly, the lack of it is sometimes embarrassing. Whenever I raise such concerns, that fraction labels me as a “skeptic” or an “ethics person.” For the record, I was writing about reward hacking in 2021, and I have published research on existential risks from AI. And I do believe that AI safety is for everyone.