Geoffrey Irving Claims False Positives Shaped OpenAI Tradeoffs

In a reply to @tomekkorbak, Geoffrey Irving states his claim that false positives were one of the reasons behind OpenAI safety decisions. He notes both reasons apply but make different predictions. One example he gives is that OpenAI will dial false positives down at the expense of false negatives. Irving is identified in the post as Chief Scientist at the UK AI Security Institute with prior roles at DeepMind, OpenAI, and Google Brain focused on alignment.