Can AI lab insiders know when a model wasn't explicitly trained for a task?
One writer argues that seeing AI succeed at tasks they know weren't explicitly trained for makes lab insiders more open to the idea of AGI. A direct reply questions how much an insider can know about everything used to train a model.
TLDR
One post argues that lab insiders can see AI succeed at tasks they know weren't explicitly trained for, while outsiders may see the same successes as the result of costly training. A direct reply asks whether the writer knows every reinforcement-learning environment and crawled or purchased dataset used at every stage of training the next GPT model, and requests an example.
Combined views
39
1 Source, first seen 9h ago