• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
AI
Reaction

Concern over Moonshot’s potential K2.8 inference costs

A poster worries that the “lightweight” K2.8 could be expensive to run if it resembles K2+.

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)T(
1 Source, 21m ago, first seen 21m ago

TLDR

A poster argues that if Moonshot’s “lightweight” K2.8 is another K2+, it would be far more expensive at inference than any DeepSeek model since April. They worry Moonshot may have scaled too early.

Combined views

727

1 Source, first seen 21m ago

9 likes2 comments1 saves

Combined views

727

1 Source, first seen 21m ago

9 likes2 comments1 saves

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

1 Source

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTex> the flagship model pushes hardcore capabilities, while lightweight K2.8 handles programming … given that even the "lightweight" K2.8 is (if it's another K2+) way more expensive at inference than *ANY* DeepSeek since April, I'm worried for Moonshot. Might have scaled too early.21m
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    1 Source

    Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTex> the flagship model pushes hardcore capabilities, while lightweight K2.8 handles programming … given that even the "lightweight" K2.8 is (if it's another K2+) way more expensive at inference than *ANY* DeepSeek since April, I'm worried for Moonshot. Might have scaled too early.21m
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet