• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    Stephen Casper Rejects 'AI as Normal Technology' Hypothesis

    MIT PhD student Stephen Casper posted the argument after the Hugging Face hacking incident and related coverage.

    C(
    1 Source, 29d ago, first seen 29d ago

    TLDR

    Stephen Casper, a final-year MIT CSAIL PhD student and Harvard Berkman Klein Fellow, wrote that the Hugging Face hacking incident and subsequent reporting make it time to reject the AI as a normal technology hypothesis. He said any version viable today would be contorted into a truism or beyond reasonable interpretation of the word normal. The post appears on social media and contains no further details, evidence, or responses from others.

    Combined views

    13.5K

    1 Source, first seen 29d ago

    Combined views

    13.5K

    1 Source, first seen 29d ago

    173 likes
    173 likes
    7 comments
    18 saves
    18 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    7 comments
    18 saves
    18 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @StephenLCasperAfter the HF hacking incident and subsequent reporting on it. It seems time to decisively reject the 'AI as a normal technology' hypothesis. Any version of it viable today would be contorted either into a truism or beyond any reasonable interpretation of the word "normal".

    1 Source

    @StephenLCasperAfter the HF hacking incident and subsequent reporting on it. It seems time to decisively reject the 'AI as a normal technology' hypothesis. Any version of it viable today would be contorted either into a truism or beyond any reasonable interpretation of the word "normal".