• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI
    AI

    AI capability gains and the timing of biological-risk warnings

    One post argues that recent AI advances have little bearing on biological risk and calls for stronger biodefense regardless of AI.

    MA
    1 Source, 15d ago, first seen 15d ago

    TLDR

    One post questions why AI-related biological-risk warnings are surfacing now, arguing that the capability gains were foreseeable when OpenAI released o1. The author says reinforcement learning and models “thinking” before answering enable rapid progress on tasks where iteration is cheap and correct answers are easy to verify. But they argue that biological threat pathways have not changed and call for stronger biodefense regardless of AI, noting that COVID-19 preceded ChatGPT.

    Combined views

    106

    1 Source, first seen 15d ago

    Combined views

    106

    1 Source, first seen 15d ago

    2 reposts
    2 reposts

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Sentiment

    Positive——Negative

    Summary

    Not enough discussion yet.

    No sentiment analysis available yet.

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    1 Source

    @martin_casadoRT @DavidRBellamy: The AI biorisk alarmists need to explain 'why now' since it was apparent that we would reach the AI capabilities we see…

    1 Source

    @martin_casadoRT @DavidRBellamy: The AI biorisk alarmists need to explain 'why now' since it was apparent that we would reach the AI capabilities we see…