Reaction
Can economics explain transformative AI?
A critic says many economists use unhelpful frameworks for understanding AGI; another sees potential in theory built on new assumptions.
TLDR
A critic estimates that 10–30 times as many economists study AI as a few years ago, but says many still fail to take AGI seriously. Another argues that much of the new work is empirical and backward-looking, while new theory could offer bigger insights. A third sees potential in microeconomic theory built on different assumptions about AI agents, but doubts economics can model a world after superintelligent AI.
Combined views
49.2K
5 Sources, first seen ago