Report
Senior patent lawyers using AI reportedly showed stronger judgment than nonusers in a three-month trial
A quoted trial account says junior lawyers had no average skill gain, with more strong scores and more low scores.
TLDR
A post quotes an account of a three-month randomized controlled trial involving practicing patent attorneys. The account says routine AI use improved work quality across the board. After 90 days, senior lawyers who used AI showed stronger judgment than those who did not, while junior lawyers had no average skill gain; their scores split into more strong scores and more low scores.
Combined views
—
1 Source, first seen ago
